STRUCTURED INTELLIGENCE
Global Risk Detection

Crises have a shape
before they have a name.

Before a pandemic is declared, before a currency breaks, before a conflict escalates, the relationships between global systems start to deform. That deformation is measurable, and it is measurable weeks in advance.

The Everything Engine monitors the structure of global interdependence continuously across 195 countries. It does not forecast from precedent and it does not wait for an indicator to move. It watches the shape of the system and reports when the shape breaks.

21 / 25
Catalogued events detected
84% recall, replayed blind
37 years
Validation window
1989 to 2026
~10 weeks
Typical lead time
Median across detected events
195
Countries monitored live
16 domains, 21 data sources

Replayed against 37 years of historical data the system had never seen, with no event calendar consulted during detection. Every signal below was flagged blind, in the event's own country, before the event.

The problem

Everyone is watching the outputs.

Global risk monitoring is built around indicators, and indicators are consequences. They tell you a crisis is underway, which is the one thing you already knew.

01

Watching indicators means waiting for the damage

Case counts, casualty figures, price moves and displacement totals are all measurements of a crisis that has already started. By the time an indicator is unambiguous, the window in which intervention was cheap has closed.

02

Forecasting models need the event to have happened before

A model trained on past pandemics predicts pandemics. It has nothing to say about the crisis that does not resemble its training set, which is reliably the one that matters. Every novel event is out of distribution by definition.

03

Analysts are organised by region and domain

The structure that carries a crisis does not respect those boundaries. Conflict pushes displacement, which stresses food systems, which moves commodity prices. Split across desks, the coupling is exactly what nobody owns.

04

Expert judgement does not scale to 195 countries

Continuous, even attention across every country and every domain is not achievable by staffing. Coverage concentrates where attention already is, so the surprises arrive from wherever nobody was looking.

The approach

Watch the connections, not the readings.

Global systems are coupled. Conflict pushes displacement. Displacement stresses food and health systems. Food prices move commodity markets. Those couplings are not declared by us and not taken from a textbook: they are measured from how the signals actually move together, and they change as the world changes.

A stable system absorbs shocks. A fragile one stops absorbing them, and the loss of that capacity shows up in the structure of the network before it shows up in any single reading.

So the engine does not ask whether a number is high. It asks whether the relationships around that number are behaving the way they normally do, and it reports the moment they stop.

Nobody tells it what a crisis looks like. That is the point: a system that has to recognise the crisis cannot see a new one.

What this produces

  • Early warning with the country and the domain attached, not a global risk index.
  • Coverage that does not depend on where analyst attention happens to be pointed.
  • Cross-domain cascade detection: which system is stressed, and what it is likely to burn through next.
  • Novel and unprecedented events handled on the same footing as familiar ones.
  • Deterministic mathematics over live feeds. No model inference and no training set to go stale.

The detection mathematics is proprietary and is not described here. Technical detail is available to qualified partners under NDA.

Live system output

Everything Engine country signal dashboard showing domain states and trend indicators
Country signal view
Everything Engine global risk network topology
Full network
Everything Engine domain coupling clusters
Domain coupling clusters
The record

Twenty-one crises, detected blind, across thirty-seven years.

The system was replayed against data from 1989 to 2026 that it had never seen, with no knowledge of which events were coming. A detection counts only when a signal escalates in a credible domain, in the event's own country, inside a twelve-week window before the event. The signals below are the ones it actually fired on.

EventYearLead timeSignal that fired
Global Financial Crisis2008
11.1 weeks
Shipping freight structural break
H1N1 Swine Flu2009
11.6 weeks
Mexico health surveillance
Arab Spring: Tunisia2011
2.7 weeks
Tunisia political unrest
Fukushima2011
10.7 weeks
Japan climate and weather
East Africa Famine2011
0.4 weeks
Kenya health (concurrent)
Annexation of Crimea2014
10.6 weeks
Russia political unrest
European Refugee Crisis2015
6.3 weeks
Turkey conflict events
Brexit Referendum2016
10.6 weeks
UK political unrest
Rohingya Crisis2017
9.7 weeks
Myanmar conflict events
Yemen Famine2017
2.4 weeks
Yemen climate and weather
COVID-19 Pandemic2020
10.4 weeks
Italy health surveillance
Tigray Conflict2020
9.4 weeks
Ethiopia political unrest
Myanmar Military Coup2021
10.1 weeks
Myanmar political unrest
Suez Canal Blockage2021
11.3 weeks
S&P 500 structural break
Invasion of Ukraine2022
9.6 weeks
Ukraine conflict events
Pakistan Floods2022
9.1 weeks
Pakistan climate and weather
Turkey/Syria Earthquake2023
5.1 weeks
Turkey climate and weather
Sudan Civil War2023
8.9 weeks
Sudan conflict events
Gaza War2023
11.9 weeks
Palestine political unrest
Iran-Israel Exchanges2024
11.9 weeks
Israel stock-index stress
Global Financial Stress2025
11.3 weeks
S&P 500 structural break
6 weeks or more of warningunder 4 weeks, weakerbar scaled to the 12-week evaluation window

Two entries are worth reading carefully rather than counted as wins. East Africa Famine 2011 fired at 0.4 weeks, which is concurrent rather than early, and Arab Spring Tunisia at 2.7 weeks is short. Both are in the ledger as detections because they met the rule, and both are weaker than the roughly ten-week cases around them.

Selected detections in detail

What the signal was, what it meant, and what followed.

Expand ›
2008

Global Financial Crisis

Shipping / Trade
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=4.2
signal
11.1 weeks
lead time

Global shipping freight was the node that broke first. Structural stress in trade and shipping coupling registered ahead of the September 2008 collapse, in a domain most financial monitoring was not watching.

Worst financial crisis since 1929. $20T+ in global wealth destruction.

2009

H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic

Health
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=4.1
signal
11.6 weeks
lead time

Mexico health surveillance broke structurally ahead of the WHO pandemic declaration, in the country where the outbreak originated.

First influenza pandemic of the 21st century.

2011

Arab Spring - Tunisia

Political
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=4.6
signal
2.7 weeks
lead time

Tunisia political unrest broke structurally ahead of Ben Ali fleeing the country. The equivalent signals for Egypt and Syria crossed threshold at or just after their tipping points and are counted as misses.

Regime change in Tunisia. Region-wide uprising followed.

* Short lead. Fast political escalations sit near the limit of a weekly detection cadence.

2014

Russian Annexation of Crimea

Political
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=7.5
signal
10.6 weeks
lead time

Russia political unrest registered one of the strongest deviations in the entire record, more than ten weeks before the annexation.

First forcible annexation of European territory since WWII.

2015

European Refugee Crisis

Conflict / Displacement
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=6.5
signal
6.3 weeks
lead time

Turkey conflict events broke structurally ahead of the mass movement into Europe, on the transit route rather than at the destination.

1.3M asylum applications in 2015. Largest refugee crisis since WWII.

2017

Rohingya Crisis

Conflict
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=11.5
signal
9.7 weeks
lead time

Myanmar conflict events produced the largest single deviation in the record, more than two months before military operations began.

700,000+ displaced. ICJ genocide proceedings.

2020

COVID-19 Pandemic

Health
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=3.7
signal
10.4 weeks
lead time

Italy health surveillance broke structurally more than ten weeks before the WHO pandemic declaration, identifying the country that became the first European epicentre.

Largest global health and economic disruption in a century.

2020

Tigray Conflict

Political
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=3.5
signal
9.4 weeks
lead time

Ethiopia political unrest broke structurally more than two months ahead of the outbreak of hostilities.

500,000+ deaths estimated. Largest humanitarian crisis of the 2020s.

2021

Suez Canal Blockage

Markets
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=4.5
signal
11.3 weeks
lead time

S&P 500 structural stress registered ahead of the Ever Given grounding and the trade disruption that followed.

$9.6B/day in delayed trade. Global supply chain disruption.

2022

Russian Invasion of Ukraine

Conflict
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=6.6
signal
9.6 weeks
lead time

Ukraine conflict events broke structurally more than two months before the February 2022 invasion.

Largest land war in Europe since WWII.

2023

Sudan Civil War

Conflict
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=5.9
signal
8.9 weeks
lead time

Sudan conflict events broke structurally ahead of the April 2023 outbreak of fighting between the SAF and RSF.

Largest displacement crisis in the world by 2024.

2023

Gaza War

Political
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=4.4
signal
11.9 weeks
lead time

Palestine political unrest broke structurally almost twelve weeks before 7 October 2023.

Ongoing regional conflict and humanitarian crisis.

2024

Iran-Israel Exchanges

Economic
SHIFT z=3.2
signal
11.9 weeks
lead time

Israel stock-index stress carried the signal. This event was recovered only after annual economic indicators were replaced with daily national stock-index data, which is documented as a change to the detector.

First direct Iran-Israel military exchanges.

2025

Global Financial Stress

Markets
STRUCTURAL BREAK z=4.1
signal
11.3 weeks
lead time

S&P 500 structural break registered ahead of the April 2025 dislocation.

Ongoing.

Non-events: stress that did not cascade

The following situations showed elevated structural stress that did not cascade into a full systemic crisis, and were assessed as contained or recovering rather than escalated. These are the cases a detector tuned for recall would have called wrongly.

  • US-China trade war escalation (2019) - detected elevated tension but no structural break; no crisis materialised
  • Brexit transition (2020) - elevated UK sub-graph fragility; contained, no systemic cascade
  • Evergrande default (2021) - Chinese real estate stress detected; contained by intervention
  • COVID Omicron wave (2021) - health graph elevated; no mortality-scale crisis materialised
  • SVB / Credit Suisse (2023) - financial stress detected; systemic contagion contained
  • Middle East conflict escalation (2024) - regional stress; no global cascade

The four misses

A recall figure quoted without its failures is marketing. Here are ours, with the reason each one failed.

Arab Spring: Egypt and Syria

Fast escalations. On a weekly cadence the signal crosses threshold at or just after the tipping point rather than before it, despite pre-tip deviation running high. A resolution limit, not a data gap.

West Africa Ebola, 2014

The only regression against our earlier method, and we chose to keep it. Recovering it would have meant lowering a threshold in a way that produced roughly 14,000 additional false detections to reinstate one marginal hit. We took precision over recall and documented the miss.

Beirut Port Explosion, 2020

A single-day industrial accident with no measurable structural precursor in any domain. Arguably unpredictable by any method.

Comparison

Against conventional risk monitoring.

Indicator and forecast monitoringStructural detection
Question askedHas something bad happened?Are the structural relationships changing in a way that means something is about to?
Novel eventsOut of distribution. The model has no precedent to matchDetected on the same basis as any other. Novelty is not a special case
CoverageConcentrated where analyst attention already isEven across 195 countries and 16 domains, continuously
Cross-domain effectsSplit across regional and thematic desksMeasured directly. Coupling between domains is the primary signal
OutputA situation report describing current conditionsWhich country, which domain, and how far ahead of the event
BasisTrained on catalogued history, or on expert priorsDeterministic mathematics over live data. No event calendar consulted

We are not claiming this replaces regional expertise or domain analysis. It tells you where and when to point them, several weeks earlier than the indicators would, and it covers the ground nobody is currently watching.

Known limitations

What this record does not establish.

Early warning is a field with a long history of overclaiming. We would rather you discount us for the limits we publish than for the ones you find later.

This is a historical replay against 25 catalogued events, not a live forecasting track record. The system was not told what to look for and the validator joined detections to events after the fact, but a replay is not the same as prospective performance.
Four events were missed and all four are named above. We publish the misses because a recall figure without them is not a result.
Lead times cluster near the 12-week evaluation window, which is the window the validator uses. Detections are credited when a node escalates in a credible domain in the event's own country within that window.
The system detects sudden onset. A slow build-up that never spikes is a real and currently open gap: we tested three designs against the 37-year record and none of them both localised and stayed quiet, so we do not ship a low-and-slow detector rather than ship one that points at noise.
Some domains are far noisier than others. Political and climate signals carry high routine churn, and discovery output is ranked against each domain's own baseline rate for that reason.
Domain coverage grows over the record, from 5 domains in 1990 to 10 by 2019, so recent periods are better instrumented than early ones.

Our internal validation record documents each threshold decision and the false-detection cost of the alternatives we rejected, including the one case where recovering a missed event would have cost roughly 14,000 spurious detections. That record is available to partners under NDA.

Who we are talking to

Where weeks of warning change the decision.

Reinsurers and Lloyd's syndicates

Pre-crisis structural signal for parametric trigger design, sovereign exposure monitoring, and portfolio-level early warning across territories you write.

Government, defence and security

Geopolitical early warning with even coverage across all 195 countries, including the ones with no desk assigned to them.

Humanitarian and multilateral bodies

Food insecurity, displacement and health signals weeks ahead of the declarations that release funding, when pre-positioning is still possible.

Sovereign funds and macro allocators

Structural stress in the coupling between economies, markets, energy and shipping, on a horizon that is actionable rather than reactive.

Ask us about the events we missed.

We will walk you through the full 37-year ledger, the detection rules, the four failures and why we chose to keep one of them. Then we will show you what the engine is flagging this week. Technical detail is available under NDA.

Request a Briefing

We respond within 48 hours. All enquiries are treated as confidential.